Keirsey Temperament TheoryAn outline of the author's definitive book on Personality and an update of the Meyers-Briggs personality system
|
To Use the Matrix: First, determine how you use words: concrete or abstract; then how you use "tools": cooperative or utilitarian. The square you're in will give you a general idea of your Temperament. The types within are explained below under "Characteristics..." You could also take their 10minute Sorter Assessment. |
Note: percentages shown are the frequency of types in the USA. |
Word usage: Abstract
|
Word usage: Concrete
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tool usage: Cooperative
|
NF – Idealists
|
SJ – Guardians
|
||||||||
Tool usage: Utilitarian
|
NT – Rationals
|
SP – Artisans
|
16 Characteristics of Personality |
|
E = Expressive talkative and sociable |
I = Reserved quiet and private |
N = Introspective abstract world of ideas |
S = Observant observe what is present |
T = Tough-minded the head rules the heart; clarity and firmness |
F = Friendly-minded the heart rules the head; compassion and consideration |
J = Scheduling judicious about schedules, closure; make up mind quickly |
P = Probing flexible schedules; perceptive of opportunities |
NF iNtuitive and Fervent |
SJ Sensible and Judicious |
NT iNgenious and Theoretical |
SP Spontaneous and Playful |
Personality = | ||
Temperament | + | Character |
Inborn, innate inclinations | + | configuration of habits, actions |
Types of Intelligence, and related skills based on Temperament | |
Tactical | expediting or improvising; troubleshooters, negotiators. |
Logistical | regulating or supporting, smart handling of goods and services; stabilizers, traditionalists. |
Diplomatic | developing or mediating; educating, guiding, motivating, conciliating; catalysts. |
Strategic | arranging or constructing; work with systems, figure out complex means to achieve defined goals; focusing on order or organization, big picture. |
Marriage So which opposites enrich the relationship (your weakness is my strength) and which erode the bond? Keirsey wrote that Rationals should marry Idealists, and Guardians should marry Artisans. He believed that concrete thinkers should partner up with concrete thinkers, and abstract thinkers with other abstract thinkers. The rationale seems to be because harmony in a relationship depends on effective communication; if we're not even speaking the same "language", we face a fundamental obstacle. Therefore, the only "opposite" that really threatened long-term viability was one partner being an abstract N thinker and the other a concrete S thinker. The (E/I), (T/F) AND (P/J) pairings mattered much less, since these sorts of "opposites" could create the "your strength, my weakness" effect which leads to intrapersonal growth. My personal belief is in line with his, with these questions: Do more pairings in common lead to greater harmony? Or are minor opposites always better for growth? i.e. Two Js can happily adhere to their scheduled routines (who will yield if they don't have the same priorities?). Two Ps can explore possibilities and generate exciting ideas (but will any major course of action get finalized?). Two Es can be the life the of the social group (or will they compete for attention and space?). Two Is can appreciate each other's halo of tranquility (but would they readily make new friends after a move to a new city?). Two Ts can smartly make difficult choices about their aging parents (but will other family members have their feelings ignored?). Two Fs can volunteer their free time helping all of the neighbors (but who will say "No" when personal time needs to be preserved?). Interesting! |
Language Subjunctive languages seem to indicate the presence of NPs. See the main grammar moods: imperative, indicative, and subjunctive at Grammarist Linguists have defined dozens of moods used in languages throughout the world, but English only uses three. In the indicative mood, for instance, the speaker is sure that something is the case, while in the imperative mood the speaker desires that something should happen. In English, the subjunctive mood is used to explore conditional or imaginary situations. The subjunctive mood is used to explore conditions that are contrary to fact... It's used to explore hypotheticals. |
Neuroscience Many researchers have correlated specific brain chemistry and neurotransmitters to specific temperament traits. A leading expert in the field is Helen Fisher, affiliated with the Kinsey Institute and Rutgers University. Her research on the brain systems that underlie human personality has identified how 4 specific brain chemicals express personality traits. In 2015 she founded the corporate consultancy NeuroColor. Hers and other research have found that brain composition directly affects personality. Four chemical systems—dopamine/norepinephrine, testosterone, serotonin, and estrogen/oxytocin—are each linked to particular personality traits. Her research aligns well with the Keirsey Temperament observations:
|
Keirsey and other scientists do not make temperament and astrological connections, because astrology "types" are in no way scientifically valid – but the similarities are interesting. More interesting patterns: Hippocrates humours; ancient Greek music modes... |
Water Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces Idealists? –Phlegmatic etheric body |
Earth Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn Guardians? –Melancholic physical body |
Air Gemini, Libra, Aquarius Rationals? –Sanguine astral body |
Fire Aries, Leo, Sagittarius Artisans? –Choleric ego and will |
Notes © 2016-2018 By paulgurney.com. All copyrights belong to their owners/creators.